Bibliography of Research on Twitter & Microblogging

  1.  Antenos-Conforti, Enza. (2009). Microblogging on Twitter: Social Networking in Intermediate Italian Classes.In Lara Lomicka and Gillian Lord (Eds.), The Next Generation: Social Networking and Online Collaboration in Foreign Language Learning. (pp. 59-90). Calico Monograph Series, No. 9. (book chapter)

  2.  Arceneaux, Noah, and Amy Schmitz Weiss. (2010). Seems Stupid Until You Try It: Press Coverage of Twitter, 2006-9. New Media and Society, . (journal article)

  3.  Böhringer, Martin. (2009). Really Social Syndication: A Conceptual View on Microblogginging. 9(31) (techreport)

  4.  Böhringer, Martin, and Richter, Alexander. (2009). Adopting Social Software to the Intranet: A Case Study on Enterprise Microblogging. Proceedings of the 9th Mensch & Computer Conference. (pp. 293-302).Berlin September 6-9. (conference paper)

  5.  Bakshy, Eytan, Hofman, Jake M., Mason, Winter A., and Watts, Duncan J.. (2011). Everyone’s an Influencer: Quantifying Influence on Twitter. Proceedings of WSDM\'11. Hong Kong, China (conference paper)

  6.  Barnes, Stuart J., Böhringer, Martin, Kurze, Christian, and Stietzel, Jacqueline. (2010). Towards an understanding of social software: the case of Arinia. Proceedings of HICSS-43.Kauai, HI January 5-8. (conference paper)

  7.  Barnes, Stuart J., and Böhringer, Martin. (2009). Continuance Usage Intention in Microblogging Services: The Case of Twitter (Konferenzbeitrag). Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).Verona, Italy June 8-10. (conference paper)

  8.  Bennato, Davide, Benhotman, Hassen, and Panconesi, Alessandro. (2010). La diffusione delle informazioni online. Il caso Twitter. X Convegno Nazionale AIS (Italian Sociological Association).Milan September.

  9.  boyd, danah, Golder, Scott, and Lotan, Gilad. (2010). Tweet Tweet Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. Proceedings of HICSS-43.Kauai, HI January 5-8. (conference paper)

  10.  Cain, Jeff, Scott, Doneka R., and Smith, Kelly. (2010). Use of social media by residency program directors for resident selection. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 67 (19), 1635-1639. (journal article)

  11.  Castaneda, Linda, costa, Cristina, and Torres-Kompen, Ricardo. (2011). The Madhouse of ideas: stories about networking and learning with twitter. Proceedings of PLE COnference 2011. (conference paper)

  12.  Cha, Meeyoung, Haddadi, Hamed, Benevenuto, Fabricio, and Gummadi, Krishna P.. (2010). Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. Proceedings of ICWSM. AAAI. (conference paper)

  13.  Chen, Jilin, Nairn, Rowan, Nelson, Les, Bernstein, Michael, and Chi, Ed H.. (2010). Short and Tweet: Experiments on Recommending Content from Information Streams. Proceedings of CHI. (conference paper)

  14.  Cheong, Mark, and Lee, Vincent. (2009). Integrating web-based intelligence retrieval and decision-making from the twitter trends knowledge base. Proceeding of the 2nd ACM workshop on Social web search and mining. (pp. 1-8). (conference paper)

  15.  Chew C, and Eysenbach G. (2010). Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak. Plos One, 5 (11), e14118. Between May 1 and December 31, 2009, authors archived over 2 million Twitter posts containing keywords “swine flu,” “swineflu,” and/or “H1N1.” using Infovigil, an infoveillance system. This study illustrates the potential of using social media (journal article)

  16.  Crawford, Kate. (2009). These Foolish Things: On Intimacy and Insignificance in Mobile Media.In Goggin, Gerard and Hjorth, Larissa (Eds.), Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunications to Media. (book chapter)

  17.  Crawford, Kate. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Journal of Media & Culture Studies, 23 (4), 525-535. (journal article)

  18.  Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Murat Ali Bayir, Murat Demirbas, and Hakan Ferhatosmanoglu. (2010). Identifying Breakpoints in Public Opinion. Proceedings of SOMA\'10 SIGKDD. (pp. 5). (conference paper)

  19.  Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, and Murat Demirbas. (2010). Twitter: Roots, Influence, Applications. (techreport)

  20.  David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, and Elizabeth F. Churchill. (2011). Peaks and Persistence:. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. (pp. 355--358). ACM. (conference paper)

  21.  Deller, Ruth A. (2011). Twittering on: audience research and participation using Twitter. Participations, 8 (1). (journal article)

  22.  Devin Gaffney. (2010). #iranElection: quantifying online activism. Proceedings of the WebSci10.Raleigh, NC April 26-27th.

  23.  Diakopoulos, N. A., and Shamma, D. A.. (2010). Characterizing Debate Performance via Aggregated Twitter Sentiment. CHI 2010.Atlanta, Georgia

  24.  Du, Hongly, Rosson, Mary Beth, Carroll, John M., and Ganoe, Craig. (2009). I felt like a contributing member of the class: increasing class participation with classcommons. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work. (pp. 232-242). (conference paper)

  25.  Dunlap, J.C., and Lowenthal, P. (2009). Tweeting the Night Away: Using Twitter to Enhance Social Presence. Journal of Information Systems Education Special Issue, Impacts of Web 2.0 and Virtual World Technologies on IS Education, 20 (2). (journal article)

  26.  Dunlap, J.C., and Lowenthal, P. R.. (2009). Horton Hears a Tweet. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 32(4). (journal article)

  27.  Dunlap, J.C., and Lowenthal, P.R.. (). Tweeting the Night Away: Using Twitter to Enhance Social Presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20 (2). (journal article)

  28.  Ebner, Martin, and Schiefner, Mandy. (2008). Microblogging - more than fun?.In ArnedilloSánchez, Inmaculada and Isaías, Pedro (Eds.), Proceedings of IADIS Mobile Learning Conference 2008. (pp. 155 - 159).Algarve, Portugal (conference paper)

  29.  Ehrlich, K., and Shami, N.S.. (2010). Microblogging inside and outside the workplace. In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. (ICWSM 2010), AAAI Publications. (conference paper)

  30.  Eva Zangerle, Wolfgang Gassler, and Guenter Specht. (2011). Using Tag Recommendations to Homogenize Folksonomies in Microblogging Environments. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social Informatics. (pp. 113-126). Springer. (conference paper)

  31.  Gayo-Avello, Daniel. (2010). Nepotistic Relationships in Twitter and their Impact on Rank Prestige Algorithms. (Preprint). (journal article)

  32.  George Veletsianos. (in press). Higher Education Scholars’ Participation and Practices on Twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, in press. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00449.x/abstract (journal article)

  33.  Gilpin, Dawn R.. (Forthcoming). Working the Twittersphere: How Public Relations Practitioners Use Microblogging for Professional Identity Construction.In Papacharissi, Zizi (Eds.), The Networked Self. (book chapter)

  34.  Gina Masullo Chen. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755-762. (journal article)

  35.  Gomez-Rodriguez, Manuel, Leskovec, Jure, and Krause, Andreas. (2010). Inferring Networks of Diffusion and Influence. Proceedings of KDD. ACM. Washington, DC (conference paper)

  36.  Greer, Clark F., and Ferguson, Douglas A. . (2011). Using Twitter for promotion and branding: A content analysis of local television Twitter sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(2), 198-214. (journal article)

  37.  Haewoon Kwak, Changhyun Lee, Hosung Park, and Sue Moon. (2010). What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media?. Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference. April 26-30, 2010, Raleigh NC (USA) (conference paper)

  38.  Haewoon, Kwak, Changhyun, Lee, Park, Hosung, and Moon, Sue. (2010). What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media?. 19th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference.Raleigh, North Carolina April.

  39.  Hermida, Alfred. (2010). Twittering the News: The Emergence of Ambient Journalism. Journalism Practice, 4 (3), 297 - 308. (journal article)

  40.  Hermida, Alfred. (2010). From TV to Twitter: How Ambient News Became Ambient Journalism. M/C Journal, 13 (2), NA. (journal article)

  41.  Herwig, Jana. (2009). Liminality and Communitas in Social Media: The Case of Twitter. Internet: Critical. Internet Research 10.0.Milwaukee October 7-10. (conference paper)

  42.  Heverin, Thomas, and Zach, Lisl. (2010). Microblogging for Crisis Communication: Examination of Twitter Use in Response to a 2009 Violent Crisis in Seattle-Tacoma, Washington Area. Proceedings of the 2010 ISCRAM Conference.Seattle, Washington

  43.  Heverin, Thomas, and Zach, Lisl. (2010). Twitter for City Police Department Information Sharing. ASIS&T.Pittsburgh, PA, USA October.

  44.  Heverin, Thomas, and Zach, Lisl. (2012). Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 34-47. (journal article)

  45.  Honeycutt, C., and Herring, Susan C.. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Los Alamitos, CA IEEE Press. (conference paper)

  46.  Huberman, Bernardo A., Romero, Daniel M., and Wu, Fang. (2008). Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope. (techreport)

  47.  Huberman, Bernardo, Romero, Daniel, and Wu, Fang. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14 (1). (journal article)

  48.  Hughes, Amanda lee, and Palen, Leysia. (2009). Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events. Proceedings of the 2009 ISCRAM Conference. (conference paper)

  49.  Ifukor. (2011). #EkitiElection: The Acts and Facts of Twittering the Final Judicial Proceedings in Nigeria (on October 15, 2010). General Online Research 2011.Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany March 14-16.

  50.  Ifukor, Presley. (2010). \"Elections\" or \"Selections\"? Blogging and Twittering the Nigerian 2007 General Elections.. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30 (6), 398-414. Twitter and the Nigerian blogosphere (journal article)

  51.  Jaime Teevan, Daniel Ramage, and Meredith Ringel Morris. (2011). #TwitterSearch: A Comparison of Microblog Search and Web Search. WSDM 2011.

  52.  Jansen, Bernard, Zhang, Mimi, Sobel, Kate, and Chowdury, Abdur. (2009). Twitter Power: Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth. Journal of ASIS&T, 60(9), 1-20. (journal article)

  53.  Java, Akshay, Song, Xiaodan, Finin, Tim, and Tseng, Belle. (2007). Why We Twitter: Understanding the Microblogging Effect in User Intentions and Communities. WebKDD.San Jose, CA August 12-15. (conference paper)

  54.  Jeff Huang, Katherine Thornton, and Efthimis N. Efthimiadis. (2010). Conversational Tagging in Twitter . Hypertext , 2010. (journal article)

  55.  John Hannon, Kevin McCarthy, and Barry Smyth. (2011). Personalized and automatic social summarization of events in video. IUI 2011, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces.Palo Alto, California February.

  56.  John Hannon, Mike Bennett, and Barry Smyth. (2010). Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches. RecSys 2010, Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems.Barcelona September.

  57.  Johnson, Philip R., and Yang, Sung-Un. (2009). Uses and Gratifications of Twitter: An Examination of User Motives and Satisfaction of Twitter Use. (techreport)

  58.  Junco, Reynol, Heiberger, Greg, and Loken, Eric. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x, 14. (journal article)

  59.  Justin W. Owens, Kelsi Lenz, and Stephanie Speagle. (2009). Trick or Tweet: How Usable is Twitter for First-Time Users?. The source of this article is Usability News, a Wichita State University newsletter produced by their Software Usability Research Laboratory (SURL). While the study is smale in scale, the research methodology appears sound. (misc)

  60.  Keim, Nina, and Clark, Jessica. (2009). Public Media 2.0 Field Report: Building Social Media Infrastructure to Engage Publics. (techreport)

  61.  Kim, Dongwoo, Jo, Yohan, Moon, Il-Chul, and Oh, Alice. (2010). Analysis of Twitter Lists as a Potential Source for Discovering Latent Characteristics of Users. Workshop on Microblogging at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. (CHI 2010). (conference paper)

  62.  Kossinets, Gueorgi, Kleinberg, Jon, and Watts, Duncan J.. (2008). The structure of information pathways in a social communication network. Proceeding of SIGKDD. ACM. New York, NY (conference paper)

  63.  Krishnamurthy, Balachander, Gill, Phillipa, and Arlitt, Martin. (2008). A few chirps about Twitter. Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks. (pp. 19-24). (conference paper)

  64.  Kwak, Haewoon, Lee, Changhyun, Park, Hosung, and Moon, Sue. (2010). What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media?. The 19th World-Wide Web (WWW) Conference.Raleigh, North Carolina (conference paper)

  65.  Lang, Anouk. (2012). Exploring the potential of social network sites in relation to intercultural communication. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11.1. Published online before print June 20, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1474022210394141. Abstract: This article reports on the results of a project which used a social network site to support students on a year abroad and foster informal learning, particularly in the (journal article)

  66.  Lars Kai Hansen, Adam Arvidsson, Finn Aarup Nielsen, Elanor Colleoni, and Michael Etter. (2011). Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter. Submitted for 2011 International Workshop on Social Computing, Network, and Services (SocialComNet 2011) (unpublished)

  67.  Lars Kai Hansen, Adam Arvidsson, Finn Aarup Nielsen, Elanor Colleoni, and Michael Etter. (2011). Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter. SocialComNet2001.Greece June.

  68.  Lars Kai Hansen, Adam Arvidsson, Finn Aarup Nielsen, Elanor Colleoni, and Michael Etter. (2011). Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter. International Workshop on Social Computing, Network, and Services (SocialComNet 2011).Loutraki, Greece June.

  69.  Lenhart, Amanda, and Fox, Susannah. (2009). Twitter and status updating. (techreport)

  70.  Lerman, K., and Ghosh, R.. (2010). Information contagion: an empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). (conference paper)

  71.  Letierce, Julie, Passant, Alexandre, Breslin, John, and Decker, Stefan. (2010). Understanding how Twitter is used to widely spread Scientific Messages. In Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line. (conference paper)

  72.  Liza Potts, Joyce Seitzinger, Dave Jones, and Angela Harrison. (2011). Tweeting Disaster: Hashtags Constructions and Collisions. Proceedings of ACM\'s SIGDOC \'11. ACM Digital Library. (conference paper)

  73.  Loudon, Lynn, and Hall, Hazel. (2010). From triviality to business tool: the case of Twitter in information services delivery. Business Information Review, 27 (4), 236-241. DOI: 10.1177/0266382110390480. The URL links to the manuscript. The full text of the final published version is available from Sage. Further publications on social computing by Dr Hazel Hall are accessible from http://www.soc.napier.ac.uk/~hazelh/esis/haz (journal article)

  74.  Makice, Kevin. (2009). Phatics and the design of community. Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. (pp. 3133-3136). (conference paper)

  75.  Markus Schedl, Peter Knees, and Sebastian Böck. (2011). Investigating the Similarity Space of Music Artists on the Micro-Blogosphere. Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR 2011).Miami, FL, USA October 2011.

  76.  Marwick, Alice, and boyd, danah. (Forthcoming). To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter. Convergence. (journal article)

  77.  Marwick, Alice, and boyd, danah. (Forthcoming). I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media and Society. (journal article)

  78.  Maurice Vergeer, Liesbeth Hermans, and Steven Sams. (2011). Is the voter only a tweet away? Micro-blogging during the 2009 European Parliament election campaign in the Netherlands. First Monday, 16(8). (journal article)

  79.  McNely, B. (2011). Sociotechnical notemaking: Short-form to long form writing practices. Present Tense, 2 (1). (journal article)

  80.  McNely, B. (2011). Informal communication, sustainability, and the public writing work of organizations. Proceedings of the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. (pp. 1–7). IEEE. (conference paper)

  81.  McNely, B.. (2009). Backchannel persistence and collaborative meaning-making. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. (pp. 297-303).Bloomington, IN Oct. 5-7. ACM. (conference paper)

  82.  McNely, B.. (2010). Exploring a sustainable and public information ecology. SIGDOC ‘10: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. (pp. 103–108). ACM. (conference paper)

  83.  Meredith Ringel Morris, Scott Counts, Asta Roseway, Aaron Hoff, and Julia Schwarz. (2012). Tweeting is Believing? Understanding Microblog Credibility Perceptions. CSCW.Seattle, WA February.

  84.  Michael D. Conover, Bruno Goncalves, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. (2011). Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Social Computing, forthcoming. (journal article)

  85.  Michael D. Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Bruno Goncalves, Matt Francisco, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. (2011). Political Polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011). (pp. 8). (conference paper)

  86.  Miller, Vincent. (2008). New Media, Networking, and Phatic Culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387 - 400. (journal article)

  87.  Mishaud, Edward. (2007). Twitter: Expressions of the Whole Self. Department of Media and Communications (mastersthesis)

  88.  Morris, Meredith Ringel, Teevan, Jaime, and Panovich, Katrina. (2010). What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why? A Survey Study of Status Message & Behavior. In Proceedings of CHI 2010. (conference paper)

  89.  Muntean, Nick, and Peterson, Anne Helen. (2009). Celebrity Twitter: Strategies of Intrusion and Disclosure in the Age of Technoculture. M/C Journal, 12 (5). (journal article)

  90.  Murat Demirbas, Murat Ali Bayir, Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Yavuz Selim Yilmaz, and Hakan Ferhatosmanoglu. (2010). Crowd-Sourced Sensing and Collaboration Using Twitter. WOWMOM.Montreal, Canada June.

  91.  Murphy, Joe. (2008). Better Practices From the Field: Micro-Blogging for Science & Technology Libraries. 28(4) (techreport)

  92.  Murthy, D.. (2011). Twitter: Microphone for the masses? . Media, Culture & Society, 33, 779-789. (journal article)

  93.  Naaman, Mor, Becker, Hila, and Gravano, Luis. (2011). Hip and Trendy: Characterizing Emerging Trends on Twitter. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (n/a). (journal article)

  94.  Naaman, Mor, Boase, Jeffery, and Lai, Chih-Hui. (2010). Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams. Proceedings of CSCW-2010.Savannah Georgia February 6-10. (conference paper)

  95.  Nagarajan, Meenakshi, Gomadam, Karthik, Sheth, Amit, Mutharaju, Raghava, and Jadhav, Ashutosh. (2009). Spatio-Temporal-Thematic Analysis of Citizen-Sensor Data - Challenges and Experiences. Tenth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. (conference paper)

  96.  O'Connor, Brendan, Balasubramanyan, Ramnath, Routledge, Bryan R., and Smith, Noah. (2010). From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series. In Proceedings of ICWSM. (conference paper)

  97.  Oulasvirta, Antti, Lehtonen, Esko, Kurvinen, Esko, and Raento, Mika. (2009). Making the ordinary visible in microblogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. Online first. Special issue on Social Interaction and Mundane Technologies (journal article)

  98.  Owen Phelan, Kevin McCarthy, and Barry Smyth. (2009). Using Twitter to Recommend Real-time Topical News. RecSys 2009 - The Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems.New York, NY, USA October.

  99.  Owen Phelan, Kevin McCarthy, Mike Bennett, and Barry Smyth. (2011). Terms of a Feather - Content-based News Recommendation & Discovery using Twitter. ECIR 2011 - The Proceedings of The 33rd European Conference on Information Retrieval.Dublin, Ireland April.

  100.  Panagiotopoulos, P., and Sams, S. (2011). Twitter in Local Government: a Study of Greater London Authorities. Open Innovation in Government Pre-ICIS workshop 2011.Shanghai, China December.

  101.  Panagiotopoulos, P., and Sams, S.. (2011). Twitter in Local Government: a Study of Greater London Authorities. Pre-ICIS Workshop 2011: Open Innovation in eGovernment.Shanghai, China December.

  102.  Passant, Alexandre, Hastrup, Tuukka, Bojars, Uldis, and Breslin, John. (2009). Microblogging: A Semantic Web and Distributed Approach. Proceedings of the the 4th Workshop Scripting For the Semantic Web (SFSW2008) co-located with ESWC2008. (conference paper)

  103.  Pérez-Latre, Francisco J., and Portilla, I.. (2011). Social Networks, Media and Audiences: A Literature Review. Comunicación y Sociedad, 24 (1), 63-74. Social networks like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter are capturing media and scholarly attention. Their spectacular growth and the public attention they command are attracting a significant amount of research and media scrutiny in English speaking countries (journal article)

  104.  Robertson, Scott P.. (2011). Changes in referents and emotions over time in election-related social networking dialog. Proceedings of HICSS-44. (pp. 1-9). (conference paper)

  105.  Robertson, Scott P., Vatrapu, R., and Medina, R.. (2009). The social life of social networks: Facebook linkage patterns in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Proceedings of dg.o2009. (pp. 6-15). (conference paper)

  106.  Robertson, Scott P., Vatrapu, R.K., and Medina, R.. (2010). Off the Wall Political Discourse: Facebook Use in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. Information Polity, 15 (1-2), 11-31. (journal article)

  107.  Robertson, Scott P., Vatrapu, R.K., and Medina, R.. (2010). Online video \"friends\" social networking. Overlapping online public spheres in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 7 (2-3), 182-201. (journal article)

  108.  Romero, Daniel, Meeder, Brendan, and Kleinberg, Jon. (2011). Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion Across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter. World Wide Web Conference (WWW). (conference paper)

  109.  Sarma, Anish Das, Sarma, Atish Das, Panigrahy, Rina, and Gollapudi, Sreenivas. (2009). Ranking Mechanisms in Twitter-like Forums. (techreport)

  110.  Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik. (2011). (Micro)Blogs: Practices of Privacy Management.In Trepte, Sabine / Leonard Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online. (pp. 157-171). Heidelberg: Springer. [preprint; book to be available at http://www.springerlink.com] (book chapter)

  111.  Shamma, D.A., Kennedy, L., and Churchill, E.F.. (2010). Tweetgeist: Can the Twitter Timeline Reveal the Structure of Broadcast Events?. CSCW 2010.

  112.  Shamma, David A., Kennedy, Lyndon, and Churchil, Elizabeth F.. (2009). Tweet the Debates: Understanding Community Annotation of Uncollected Sources. ACM Multimedia.Beijing, China (conference paper)

  113.  Shannon B. Rinaldo, Suzanne Tapp, and Debra A. Laverie. (2011). Learning by Tweeting: Using Twitter as a Pedagogical Tool. Journal of Marketing Education, 33 (2), 193-203. (journal article)

  114.  Smith, A., and Rainie, L. (2010). 8% of online Americans use Twitter. Subreport of research from Pew Internet & American Life Project (misc)

  115.  Stankovic, Milan. (2009). Faceted Online Presence – A Semantic Web Approach. (mastersthesis)

  116.  Stankovic, Milan. (2009). Faceted Online Presence – A Semantic Web Approach. (mastersthesis)

  117.  Stankovic, Milan, Passant, A, and Laublet, P.. (2009). Directing Status Messages to their Audiences in Online Communities. Pre-proceedings of Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms Workshop.Torino, Italy September 7-11. (conference paper)

  118.  Stankovic, Milan, Passant, Alexandre, and Laublet, Philippe. (2009). Status Messages for the Right Audience with an Ontology-Based Approach. The First International Workshop On Collaborative Social Networks - CollaborateSN.Washington, D.C. November 11th. (conference paper)

  119.  Starbird, Kate, Palen, Leysia, Hughes, Amanda, and Vieweg, Sarah. (2010). Chatter on The Red: What Hazards Threat Reveals about the Social Life of Microblogged Information. Proceedings of the ACM 2010 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. (CSCW 2010) (conference paper)

  120.  Stieger, S., and Burger, C.. (2009). Let's go formative: Continuous student ratings with Web 2.0 application Twitter. CyberPsychology & Behavior. (journal article)

  121.  Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Cheang CW, Kitto E, Lee H, Redhead J, Ward S, Ahmed OH, and McCrory PR . (2011). What’s happening? A content analysis of concussion-related traffic on Twitter. British Journal of Sports Medicine, doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.080341. (journal article)

  122.  Sutton, J., Palen, Leysia, and Shlovski, Irina. (2008). Back-Channels on the Front Lines: Emerging Use of Social Media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfires. Proceedings of the 2008 ISCRAM Conference.Washington, D.C. (journal article)

  123.  Taekke, Jesper. (2011). Structural Coupling and Translation – Twitter observed as Communication Medium and Non-human Actor.. Power and Participation: The 25th Conference of the Nordic Sociological Association 2011.Oslo august.

  124.  Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., and Paltoglou, G.. (2011). Sentiment in Twitter events. . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 406-418. Analysis of changes in sentiment related to major events discussed in Twitter. (journal article)

  125.  Tianyin Xu, Yang Chen, Lei Jiao, Ben Y. Zhao, Pan Hui, and Xiaoming Fu. (2011). Scaling Microblogging Services with Divergent Traffic Demands. Proceedings of ACM/IFIP/USENIX 12th International Middleware Conference (Middleware 2011). (pp. 20-40). (conference paper)

  126.  Vasileios Lampos, and Nello Cristianini. (2010). Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the Social Web. 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing.Elba Island, Italy June.

  127.  Vasileios Lampos, and Nello Cristianini. (2011). Nowcasting Events from the Social Web with Statistical Learning. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), x(x). Accepted for Publication. (journal article)

  128.  Vasileios Lampos, Tijl De Bie, and Nello Cristianini. (2010). Flu Detector - Tracking Epidemics on Twitter. ECML PKDD 2010.Barcelona, Spain September. Check Flu Detector\'s website: http://geopatterns.enm.bris.ac.uk/epidemics/

  129.  Wagner, Claudia, and Strohmaier, Markus. (2010). The Wisdom in Tweetonomies: Acquiring Latent Conceptual Structures. Semantic Search Workshop at WWW2010. (conference paper)

  130.  Weisbuch, Max, Ivcevic, Zorana, and Ambady, Nalini. (2009). On being liked on the web and in the 'real world': Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (3), 573 - 576. (journal article)

  131.  Wohn, D. Y., and Na, E.-K.. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday, 16 (3). (journal article)

  132.  Wu, Shaomei, Hofman, Jake M., Mason, Winter A., and Watts, Duncan J.. (2011). Who Says What to Whom on Twitter. Proceedings of WWW\'11. Hyderabad, India (conference paper)

  133.  Yardi, Sarita, and boyd, danah. (2010). Tweeting from the Town Square: Measuring Geographic Local Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Washington, DC (conference paper)

  134.  Yardi, Sarita, and boyd, danah. (2010). Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30 (5). (journal article)

  135.  Yardi, Sarita, Romero, Daniel, Schoenebeck, Grant, and boyd, danah. (2010). Detecting spam in a Twitter network. First Monday, 15(1-4). (journal article)

  136.  Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media and Society, 2011. Published online before print May 31, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1461444810385097 (journal article)

  137.  Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and Social Media How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. forthcoming 2012 (book chapter)

  138.  Zhao, Dejin, and Rosson, Mary Beth. (2009). How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. (conference paper)